Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04047
Original file (BC 2014 04047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04047

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect North Carolina 
on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He lived in North Carolina prior to joining the military.  His 
DD Form 214 currently reflects is HOR Fallbrook, CA.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 
7 Jun 05.

The applicant was discharged with an honorable characterization 
of service on 9 May 15, and was credited with 9 years, 
11 months, and 3 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The DD Form 4, 
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United 
States, is the source document for HOR.  AFPC Enlisted 
Accessions Branch confirmed that the member initialed his DD 
Form 4, listing Fallbrook, CA as his HOR.  The Joint Federal 
Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume 1, Appendix A1, Part 1, states, 
“The place recorded as the home of the individual when 
reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that 
recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, or inducted, or 
ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in 
service of more than one full day.  Only if a break in service 
exceeds one full day; may the member change the HOR.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 25 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04047 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04047 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Sep 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 15 Dec 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 15.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02082

    Original file (BC 2014 02082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03485

    Original file (BC 2014 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04246

    Original file (BC 2014 04246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to the AF Form 768, Extended Active Duty Order, the applicant commissioned with the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 04. The applicant’s military personnel record was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02696

    Original file (BC 2014 02696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4, dated 13 Sep 05, which lists Largo, Florida as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621

    Original file (BC 2013 01621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02416

    Original file (BC 2014 02416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no error or injustice that would justify a change in the applicant’s HOR. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01492

    Original file (BC 2014 01492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1 states, “The place recorded as the home of record of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01593

    Original file (BC 2014 01593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01593 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Place of Enlistment (POE) and Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Desoto, Texas 75115. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04873

    Original file (BC 2013 04873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The home of record on his DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, be changed from Eugene Oregon to Gold Beach, Oregon. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02279

    Original file (BC 2014 02279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02279 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his home of record (HOR) as Othello, WA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends...